Sign in

Myths & warnings

Incenseandbukhūrinruqyah

Almost universal in practice, and the scholars say it has no basis. This one also cuts against a line in our own material.

3 min readReviewed 2026-08-22

What the scholars say

Walk into a ruqyah session in a great many places and the first thing you meet is the smell — incense burning, sometimes the patient told to breathe it in, sometimes the room filled with it before anybody recites.

The scholars asked about it are not gentle. Ibn Baz holds that there is no sharia basis for fumigating a patient and that the obligation is to leave it, being among the superstitions that have no root. Another of the fatwa bodies goes further still, placing the use of incense in ruqyah among the rituals of the charlatans.

The argument

It is an argument from silence, of the strong kind.

The Prophet ﷺ performed ruqyah, was recited over, and taught his Companions to do it. They treated the sick at length, with knowledge of their people and every desire to benefit them. Not one of them is reported to have burned anything for it — and this is not an absence of evidence in some corner of the tradition nobody wrote about. Ruqyah is among the best-documented practices there is. Had fumigation belonged to it, it would be there.

What incense does instead is two things, neither of which is treatment. It creates atmosphere: smoke, dim light and smell change how a room feels, and a room that feels charged makes what happens in it feel significant, which is theatre — and theatre is what the sources warn produces false cases. And it is something only the practitioner has. A practice requiring a particular incense burned in a particular way is a practice you cannot do at home, so the test this site runs throughout — could you do it yourself, for nothing — comes back no.

The tension in our own material

Our raqi studies section carries a page on herbs alongside ruqyah, drawn from a practitioner source. Among its principles is one about fumigation: that it may be used, but that in excess it harms the patient more than the jinn.

That is a practitioner's working caution about dose, and it sits on the same site as fatwas holding that the practice has no basis at all and should be left. Two positions, on one site, not acknowledging one another. We should not leave it that way.

Our own rule for exactly this situation is already written into the Raqi Course: experience is worth having, and it is never a ruling. Applied here it gives a clear answer — the practitioner principle describes what some raqis do, and does not establish that they should. If this page is approved, the herbs article gets a line saying so and the two stop contradicting each other.

If a practitioner reaches for it

You are not obliged to make a scene, but you may say you would rather not, and a practitioner who cannot proceed without it has told you something about his method.

And if you have burned incense yourself believing it part of the treatment, nothing bad has happened to you. You have not committed shirk by lighting something. Stop doing it, and recite.

Sources

  • binbaz 20173 — https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/20173/
  • Fatwa 130639 — https://www.islamweb.net/ar/fatwa/130639/
  • Fatwa 146715 — https://www.islamweb.net/amp/ar/fatwa/146715/
NextWhether sihr and possession pause in RamadanPeople expect relief for the month and are quietly disappointed every year. The expectation was never right.Read
Was this page helpful?

Paused

0:000:00